Railtel Corporation Of India Limited vs Primatel Fibcom Limited

ik-124157748 Delhi High Court 9 December 2024 • 20 min read

Judges (1)

Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora Delivered

Counsel (9)

Adhish Srivastva Counsel Respondent Akshita Nigam Counsel Respondent Alok Kumar Singh Counsel Petitioner Hargun Singh Kalra Counsel Respondent Manish Vashisht Counsel Petitioner Navdeep Jain Counsel Respondent Nirmit Bhalla Counsel Respondent Rohit Gandhi Counsel Respondent Vedansh Vashisht Counsel Petitioner

Parties (2)

Primatel Fibcom Limited Respondent Railtel Corporation of India Limited Petitioner

Case Significance

Railtel Corporation Of India Limited vs Primatel Fibcom Limited is a Delhi High Court decision dated December 9, 2024 (citation: ik-124157748). Railtel Corporation appealed under Section 37(2)(a) of the Arbitration Act against a procedural order of the Sole Arbitrator that rejected its belated counter-claim and denied its request for oral evidence in arbitral proceedings at the final arguments stage. The court held that the counter-claim had not been rejected on merits or limitation grounds but only on procedural timeliness, and therefore the appellant had no remedy under Section 37(2)(a) or Section 34. The appeal was dismissed, with The case was heard by Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora.

Summary

Railtel Corporation appealed under Section 37(2)(a) of the Arbitration Act against a procedural order of the Sole Arbitrator that rejected its belated counter-claim and denied its request for oral evidence in arbitral proceedings at the final arguments stage. The court held that the counter-claim had not been rejected on merits or limitation grounds but only on procedural timeliness, and therefore the appellant had no remedy under Section 37(2)(a) or Section 34. The appeal was dismissed, with the court noting that Railtel was at liberty to initiate independent proceedings for adjudication of its counter-claims.

What was the outcome of Railtel Corporation Of India Limited vs Primatel Fibcom Limited?

Railtel Corporation appealed under Section 37(2)(a) of the Arbitration Act against a procedural order of the Sole Arbitrator that rejected its belated counter-claim and denied its request for oral evi...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-124157748)