Madhukar Motiram Bachhav vs Arbitrator And Additional ...

ik-118429486 Bombay High Court 18 December 2025 • WRIT PETITION NO. 16744 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 16745 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 16746 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 16749 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 16750 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 16751 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 16752 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 16754 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 16762 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34233 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34239 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34282 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34343 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34340 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34351 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34356 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34370 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34368 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34361 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34383 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34377 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34873 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34379 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34381 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34386 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34382 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34389 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34392 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34394 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34395 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34398 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34401 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34432 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34444 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34633 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34784 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34791 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34607 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34639 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 34435 OF 2025; Writ Petition No.6771 of 2021; Civil Appeal No.7064 of 2019; Writ Petition No.13634 of 2025; Writ Petition No. 16370 of 2023; Writ Petition No. 14309 of 2025; Writ Petition No. 7644 of 2024; Writ Petition No. 16370 of 2023; Writ Petition No. 13634 of 2025 • 21 min read

Judges (2)

Counsel (1)

Parties (4)

Case Significance

Madhukar Motiram Bachhav vs Arbitrator And Additional ... is a Bombay High Court decision dated December 18, 2025 (citation: ik-118429486). Multiple landowners whose land was acquired for NHAI highway projects filed writ petitions seeking solatium and interest under Sections 23(1A), 23(2), and 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, relying on the Supreme Court's Tarsem Singh judgment. The Division Bench directed the Competent Authority to compute and disburse solatium and interest within specified timelines, with NHAI to deposit amounts within three months. Disposition was subject to the Supreme Court's pending review in Tarsem Si The bench comprised Justices Aarti Sathe and G.S. Kulkarni. The judgment was delivered by Justice G.S. Kulkarni. Counsel appearing: A.S. Bapat (counsel for petitioner).

Summary

Multiple landowners whose land was acquired for NHAI highway projects filed writ petitions seeking solatium and interest under Sections 23(1A), 23(2), and 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, relying on the Supreme Court's Tarsem Singh judgment. The Division Bench directed the Competent Authority to compute and disburse solatium and interest within specified timelines, with NHAI to deposit amounts within three months. Disposition was subject to the Supreme Court's pending review in Tarsem Singh.

What was the outcome of Madhukar Motiram Bachhav vs Arbitrator And Additional ...?

Multiple landowners whose land was acquired for NHAI highway projects filed writ petitions seeking solatium and interest under Sections 23(1A), 23(2), and 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, relying...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-118429486)