Madhukar Motiram Bachhav vs Arbitrator And Additional ...
Judges (2)
Counsel (1)
Case Significance
Madhukar Motiram Bachhav vs Arbitrator And Additional ... is a Bombay High Court decision dated December 18, 2025 (citation: ik-118429486). Multiple landowners whose land was acquired for NHAI highway projects filed writ petitions seeking solatium and interest under Sections 23(1A), 23(2), and 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, relying on the Supreme Court's Tarsem Singh judgment. The Division Bench directed the Competent Authority to compute and disburse solatium and interest within specified timelines, with NHAI to deposit amounts within three months. Disposition was subject to the Supreme Court's pending review in Tarsem Si The bench comprised Justices Aarti Sathe and G.S. Kulkarni. The judgment was delivered by Justice G.S. Kulkarni. Counsel appearing: A.S. Bapat (counsel for petitioner).
Summary
Multiple landowners whose land was acquired for NHAI highway projects filed writ petitions seeking solatium and interest under Sections 23(1A), 23(2), and 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, relying on the Supreme Court's Tarsem Singh judgment. The Division Bench directed the Competent Authority to compute and disburse solatium and interest within specified timelines, with NHAI to deposit amounts within three months. Disposition was subject to the Supreme Court's pending review in Tarsem Singh.
What was the outcome of Madhukar Motiram Bachhav vs Arbitrator And Additional ...?
Multiple landowners whose land was acquired for NHAI highway projects filed writ petitions seeking solatium and interest under Sections 23(1A), 23(2), and 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, relying...
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.
Read on Indian KanoonSource: Indian Kanoon (ik-118429486)