Syed Javed Syed Chand vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ...

ik-117978971 Bombay High Court 25 October 2024 • WRIT PETITION NO. 7355 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6729 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6737 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6735 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6738 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 7977 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10913 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10938 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10956 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10291 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10817 OF 2024 • 31 min read

Judges (2)

Mangesh S. Patil Delivered Shailesh P. Brahme Coram

Counsel (7)

Amarjitsing B. Girase Counsel Respondent I. D. Maniyar Counsel Respondent R. S. Wani Counsel Respondent S. B. Ghute Counsel Respondent Sachin S. Deshmukh Counsel Petitioner Saie S. Joshi Counsel Respondent V. S. Panpatte Counsel Petitioner

Parties (5)

Gurudev Shikshan Sanstha Respondent State of Maharashtra Respondent Komal Balaji Awatirak Petitioner Pooja Balaji Wadje Petitioner Syed Javed Syed Chand Petitioner

Case Significance

Syed Javed Syed Chand vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ... is a Bombay High Court decision dated October 25, 2024 (citation: ik-117978971). Eleven connected writ petitions by Shikshan Sevaks (education volunteers) and teachers challenged the validity of Government Resolution dated 27.03.2024 creating appellate committees for service disputes. The petitioners argued the GR impermissibly created quasi-judicial forums by executive power. The Aurangabad Bench dismissed all petitions, holding the GR did not create a quasi-judicial forum or tribunal and was within the State's legislative competence, directing petitioners to approach th The bench comprised Justices Mangesh S. Patil and Shailesh P. Brahme. The judgment was delivered by Justice Mangesh S. Patil.

Summary

Eleven connected writ petitions by Shikshan Sevaks (education volunteers) and teachers challenged the validity of Government Resolution dated 27.03.2024 creating appellate committees for service disputes. The petitioners argued the GR impermissibly created quasi-judicial forums by executive power. The Aurangabad Bench dismissed all petitions, holding the GR did not create a quasi-judicial forum or tribunal and was within the State's legislative competence, directing petitioners to approach the appellate committees within four weeks.

What was the outcome of Syed Javed Syed Chand vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ...?

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-117978971)