Mohd Abdul Rehman vs State Nct Of Delhi
Judges (2)
Counsel (4)
Case Significance
Mohd Abdul Rehman vs State Nct Of Delhi is a Delhi High Court decision dated December 23, 2024 (citation: ik-117174595). The appellant challenged his conviction under Sections 18 and 18B of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 by the Special NIA Court, which sentenced him to seven years and five months rigorous imprisonment for conspiracy to commit terrorist acts. The Court examined the evidence of his association with terrorist organisations and found the clandestine support to declared terrorist organisations sufficient to establish conspiracy for committing a terrorist act under Section 15 of UAPA. The bench comprised Justices Amit Sharma and Prathiba M. Singh. The judgment was delivered by Justice Prathiba M. Singh. Counsel appearing: Divya Yadav (counsel for respondent), Harsh Kumar (counsel for appellant), Lalit Luthra (counsel for respondent), Ritesh Kumar Bahri (counsel for respondent).
Summary
The appellant challenged his conviction under Sections 18 and 18B of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 by the Special NIA Court, which sentenced him to seven years and five months rigorous imprisonment for conspiracy to commit terrorist acts. The Court examined the evidence of his association with terrorist organisations and found the clandestine support to declared terrorist organisations sufficient to establish conspiracy for committing a terrorist act under Section 15 of UAPA. The appeal was dismissed and the conviction upheld.
What was the outcome of Mohd Abdul Rehman vs State Nct Of Delhi?
The appellant challenged his conviction under Sections 18 and 18B of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 by the Special NIA Court, which sentenced him to seven years and five months rigorou...
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.
Read on Indian KanoonSource: Indian Kanoon (ik-117174595)