Chandrakant Gangadharrao Patil And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others

ik-109279761 Bombay High Court 18 November 2024 • WRIT PETITION NO. 1155 OF 2022; CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1922 OF 2022; Writ Petition No. 1155 of 2022 • 10 min read

Judges (2)

S.G. Chapalgaonkar Coram Vibha V. Kankanwadi Delivered

Counsel (4)

A.B. Kadethankar Counsel Respondent A.V. Lavte Counsel Respondent N.K. Tungar Counsel Petitioner Vishal A. Kakade Counsel Respondent

Parties (5)

State of Maharashtra Respondent Chandrakant Gangadharrao Patil Petitioner Durgaprasad Rajeshwarrao Deshpande Respondent Suraksha Chandrakantrao Patil Petitioner Vijaykumar Chandrakantrao Patil Petitioner

Case Significance

Chandrakant Gangadharrao Patil And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others is a Bombay High Court decision dated November 18, 2024 (citation: ik-109279761). Criminal writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR (Crime No. 0119/2022) under Sections 109, 120-B, 34, 447, 451, 452, and 384 IPC filed by an Ad-hoc District Judge against his wife's parents and brother (legal practitioners) for alleged house trespass, wrongful confinement, and extortion. The Court found that the wife's parents were invited to the house by their daughter and were residing at her pleasure, with no criminal intent. The FIR and consequent proceedings were quashed as an abuse of The bench comprised Justices S.G. Chapalgaonkar and Vibha V. Kankanwadi. The judgment was delivered by Justice Vibha V. Kankanwadi. Counsel appearing: A.B. Kadethankar (counsel for respondent), A.V. Lavte (counsel for respondent), N.K. Tungar (counsel for petitioner), Vishal A. Kakade (counsel for respondent).

Summary

Criminal writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR (Crime No. 0119/2022) under Sections 109, 120-B, 34, 447, 451, 452, and 384 IPC filed by an Ad-hoc District Judge against his wife's parents and brother (legal practitioners) for alleged house trespass, wrongful confinement, and extortion. The Court found that the wife's parents were invited to the house by their daughter and were residing at her pleasure, with no criminal intent. The FIR and consequent proceedings were quashed as an abuse of process of law.

What was the outcome of Chandrakant Gangadharrao Patil And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others?

Criminal writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR (Crime No. 0119/2022) under Sections 109, 120-B, 34, 447, 451, 452, and 384 IPC filed by an Ad-hoc District Judge against his wife's parents and broth...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-109279761)