Green Gene Enviro Protection And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra, Through Its ...

ik-108795006 Bombay High Court 24 December 2025 • WRIT PETITION NO. 11058 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 11059 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 11198 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 11753 OF 2025; Writ Petition No.11198 of 2025; Writ Petition No.11059 of 2025; Writ Petition No.11753 of 2025 • 18 min read

Judges (2)

Gautam A. Ankhad Coram Shree Chandrashekhar Delivered

Counsel (13)

Desai Legal LLP Firm Abhijeet Desai Counsel Petitioner Ashutosh M. Kulkarni Counsel Respondent Daksha Punghera Counsel Petitioner Karan Gajra Counsel Petitioner M. P. Thakur Counsel Respondent Meghana Chavan Counsel Respondent Milind Sathe Counsel Respondent Mohini A. Rehpade Counsel Petitioner O.A. Chandurkar Counsel Respondent Pooja Patil Counsel Respondent Sarthak Diwan Counsel Respondent Vijay Singh Counsel Petitioner

Parties (6)

Maharashtra Public Service Commission Respondent State of Maharashtra Respondent Amit Arun Londhe Petitioner Kartiki Awantika Petitioner Patil Naresh Dongar Petitioner Shruti Hemant Wade Petitioner

Case Significance

Green Gene Enviro Protection And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra, Through Its... is a Bombay High Court decision dated December 24, 2025 (citation: ik-108795006). Four connected writ petitions by MPSC competitive examination candidates challenging the evaluation of their answer-books, having narrowly missed the cut-off marks. The petitioners sought perusal and re-evaluation of their answers. Applying the Supreme Court's Tirtha Sarathi Mukherjee principle, the Division Bench (CJ Shree Chandrashekhar and Gautam A. Ankhad J) permitted the petitioners to peruse their answer-books only for the limited purpose of checking if no marks were awarded for correct The bench comprised Justices Gautam A. Ankhad and Shree Chandrashekhar. The judgment was delivered by Justice Shree Chandrashekhar.

Summary

Four connected writ petitions by MPSC competitive examination candidates challenging the evaluation of their answer-books, having narrowly missed the cut-off marks. The petitioners sought perusal and re-evaluation of their answers. Applying the Supreme Court's Tirtha Sarathi Mukherjee principle, the Division Bench (CJ Shree Chandrashekhar and Gautam A. Ankhad J) permitted the petitioners to peruse their answer-books only for the limited purpose of checking if no marks were awarded for correct answers or correct answers were treated as wrong, but declined general re-evaluation, resolving doubts in favour of MPSC.

What was the outcome of Green Gene Enviro Protection And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra, Through Its...?

Four connected writ petitions by MPSC competitive examination candidates challenging the evaluation of their answer-books, having narrowly missed the cut-off marks. The petitioners sought perusal and ...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-108795006)