M/S. Nizamsingh Chauhan, Thr. Its ... vs Union Of India, Thr. Secretary, ...

ik-107268158 Bombay High Court 12 November 2024 • WRIT PETITION NO.4446; WRIT PETITION NO.4445; WRIT PETITION NO.4474; WRIT PETITION NO.4476; WRIT PETITION NO.4473; WRIT PETITION NO.4475; WRIT PETITION NO.4916; WRIT PETITION NO.4913; WRIT PETITION NO.4915; WRIT PETITION NO.4914 • 35 min read

Judges (2)

Avinash G. Gharote Delivered M.S. Jawalkar Coram

Counsel (3)

C.J. Dhumne Counsel Respondent Masood Shareef Counsel Respondent U.V. Chakravarty Counsel Petitioner

Parties (4)

Biswajeet Enterprises Petitioner MOIL Limited Respondent Nizamsingh Chauhan Petitioner Union of India Respondent

Case Significance

M/S. Nizamsingh Chauhan, Thr. Its ... vs Union Of India, Thr. Secretary, ... is a Bombay High Court decision dated November 12, 2024 (citation: ik-107268158). Ten connected writ petitions by mining contractors (Biswajeet Enterprises and others) challenging their disqualification from MOIL Limited's (a State within Article 12) tender process at Beldongri Mines. The petitioners' bids were rejected for alleged non-compliance with tender conditions. The Court held the disqualification was unwarranted and set aside the communications barring the petitioners from future contracts, but declined to disturb the already-awarded contracts as work had substant The bench comprised Justices Avinash G. Gharote and M.S. Jawalkar. The judgment was delivered by Justice Avinash G. Gharote. Counsel appearing: C.J. Dhumne (counsel for respondent), Masood Shareef (counsel for respondent), U.V. Chakravarty (counsel for petitioner).

Summary

Ten connected writ petitions by mining contractors (Biswajeet Enterprises and others) challenging their disqualification from MOIL Limited's (a State within Article 12) tender process at Beldongri Mines. The petitioners' bids were rejected for alleged non-compliance with tender conditions. The Court held the disqualification was unwarranted and set aside the communications barring the petitioners from future contracts, but declined to disturb the already-awarded contracts as work had substantially progressed, partly allowing the petitions.

What was the outcome of M/S. Nizamsingh Chauhan, Thr. Its ... vs Union Of India, Thr. Secretary, ...?

Ten connected writ petitions by mining contractors (Biswajeet Enterprises and others) challenging their disqualification from MOIL Limited's (a State within Article 12) tender process at Beldongri Min...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-107268158)