Sangita Gangadhar Dhande vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ...

ik-107155549 Bombay High Court 25 October 2024 • WRIT PETITION NO. 7355 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6729 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6737 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6735 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6738 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 7977 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10913 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10938 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10956 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10291 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10817 OF 2024 • 31 min read

Judges (2)

Mangesh S. Patil Delivered Shailesh P. Brahme Coram

Counsel (7)

Amarjitsing B. Girase Counsel Respondent I. D. Maniyar Counsel Respondent R. S. Wani Counsel Respondent S. B. Ghute Counsel Respondent Sachin S. Deshmukh Counsel Petitioner Saie S. Joshi Counsel Respondent V. S. Panpatte Counsel Petitioner

Parties (4)

Gurudev Shikshan Sanstha Respondent State of Maharashtra Respondent Komal Balaji Awatirak Petitioner Pooja Balaji Wadje Petitioner

Case Significance

Sangita Gangadhar Dhande vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ... is a Bombay High Court decision dated October 25, 2024 (citation: ik-107155549). Eleven connected writ petitions by Shikshan Sevak (teaching assistants) and teachers from the Nanded, Latur, and other districts challenging a Government Resolution dated 27.03.2024 that created an appellate committee/forum for resolving service disputes. The petitioners argued the GR impermissibly created a quasi-judicial tribunal by executive order. The Division Bench held the GR was within legislative competence and did not create a quasi-judicial forum, dismissed all petitions, and direct The bench comprised Justices Mangesh S. Patil and Shailesh P. Brahme. The judgment was delivered by Justice Mangesh S. Patil.

Summary

Eleven connected writ petitions by Shikshan Sevak (teaching assistants) and teachers from the Nanded, Latur, and other districts challenging a Government Resolution dated 27.03.2024 that created an appellate committee/forum for resolving service disputes. The petitioners argued the GR impermissibly created a quasi-judicial tribunal by executive order. The Division Bench held the GR was within legislative competence and did not create a quasi-judicial forum, dismissed all petitions, and directed petitioners to approach the appellate committee within four weeks.

What was the outcome of Sangita Gangadhar Dhande vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ...?

Eleven connected writ petitions by Shikshan Sevak (teaching assistants) and teachers from the Nanded, Latur, and other districts challenging a Government Resolution dated 27.03.2024 that created an ap...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-107155549)