Tinu Harish Biste vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr
Judges (1)
Counsel (3)
Case Significance
Tinu Harish Biste vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr is a Bombay High Court decision dated November 11, 2024 (citation: ik-106762229). The petitioner, a vegetable vendor from Ambernath, challenged his externment order under Section 56(1)(a)(b) of the Maharashtra Police Act for a period of two years from multiple districts. The Bombay High Court quashed both the externment order and the Divisional Commissioner's appellate order, holding that the competent authority failed to apply mind to the duration of the restraint, imposing the maximum two-year period without sufficient reasons. The case was heard by Justice Shyam C. Chandak. Counsel appearing: Ghansham Jadhav (counsel for petitioner), Monty Teckchandani (counsel for petitioner), P.N. Dabholkar (counsel for respondent).
Summary
The petitioner, a vegetable vendor from Ambernath, challenged his externment order under Section 56(1)(a)(b) of the Maharashtra Police Act for a period of two years from multiple districts. The Bombay High Court quashed both the externment order and the Divisional Commissioner's appellate order, holding that the competent authority failed to apply mind to the duration of the restraint, imposing the maximum two-year period without sufficient reasons.
What was the outcome of Tinu Harish Biste vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr?
The petitioner, a vegetable vendor from Ambernath, challenged his externment order under Section 56(1)(a)(b) of the Maharashtra Police Act for a period of two years from multiple districts. The Bombay...
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.
Read on Indian KanoonSource: Indian Kanoon (ik-106762229)