Evaristo D Silva vs State, Thr. The Public Prosecutor And ...
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Case Significance
Evaristo D Silva vs State, Thr. The Public Prosecutor And ... is a Bombay High Court decision dated November 19, 2024 (citation: ik-103460885). The petitioner, an accused in a vehicular accident case under Sections 279 and 337 IPC, challenged the Magistrate's cognizance taken on a chargesheet filed beyond the limitation period. The Bombay High Court at Goa rejected the petition, holding that while the Magistrate's order condoning the delay lacked sufficient reasoning, no jurisdictional error warranted interference under Article 227 of the Constitution. The case was heard by Justice Bharat P. Deshpande. Counsel appearing: Franco Coburn (counsel for respondent), Mark Valadares (counsel for respondent), S.G. Bhobe (counsel for respondent), Shane Gomes Pereira (counsel for petitioner).
Summary
The petitioner, an accused in a vehicular accident case under Sections 279 and 337 IPC, challenged the Magistrate's cognizance taken on a chargesheet filed beyond the limitation period. The Bombay High Court at Goa rejected the petition, holding that while the Magistrate's order condoning the delay lacked sufficient reasoning, no jurisdictional error warranted interference under Article 227 of the Constitution.
What was the outcome of Evaristo D Silva vs State, Thr. The Public Prosecutor And ...?
The petitioner, an accused in a vehicular accident case under Sections 279 and 337 IPC, challenged the Magistrate's cognizance taken on a chargesheet filed beyond the limitation period. The Bombay Hig...
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.
Read on Indian KanoonSource: Indian Kanoon (ik-103460885)